Democracy Dies in Darkness

When the U.S. funds global health, other countries do too

Analysis by
March 21, 2017 at 8:00 a.m. EDT
Health workers take blood samples for testing at an Ebola screening tent in the local government hospital in Kenema, Sierra Leone in June 2014. (Tommy Trenchard/Reuters)

In President Trump’s proposed budget, there’s a $54 billion bump in military spending. U.S. foreign aid would be cut by 28 percent. Global health spending beyond AIDS, malaria and vaccines will suffer.

This type of foreign aid, according to many U.S. policymakers and military leaders, increases soft power, or the global influence the United States has because it supports basic human rights and humanitarian causes. Emma-Louise Anderson and I show this payoff for the United States among people living with HIV in Zambia and Malawi.