The CPD Blog is intended to stimulate dialog among scholars and practitioners from around the world in the public diplomacy sphere. The opinions represented here are the authors' own and do not necessarily reflect CPD's views. For blogger guidelines, click here.

Ashura: The Soft Source of Iran’s Conduct

Dec 7, 2011


Throughout history, many nations have relied on historical phenomena, narratives, and myths to define their identities and their relation to the outside reality. When narratives survive the test of time and space, they become meta-narratives which shape the worldview and the conduct of the societies they encompass. In addition to having profound effects on the socio-cultural process, meta-narratives sometimes influence and explicate the international behavior of a nation. Almost all of us are familiar with the Christian concept of Manifest Destiny and how it is has always been relevant to U.S. foreign policy. For the majority of Iranians, as Muslim Shias, Ashura has clearly been the meta-narrative. It has particularly been important since the establishment of the Islamic Republic in Iran and one could surely see the footprint of this narrative in Iran's foreign policy. In order to comprehend and develop expectations about the Islamic Republic of Iran's international behavior, one should first understand the narrative of Ashura.

Ashura is a day in the month of Muhharram in the lunar calendar (December 6th in 2011) which refers to several historical events in Islam including the significant Battle of Karbala (Iraq, 680 CE), where Imam Hossein, the grandson of the Prophet Mohammad, was killed along his family and companions in an uprising against the oppressive rule of Yazid. In the eyes of Shia Muslims, Hossein's martyrdom is not a story of meaningless defeat, but a grand narrative of victory for humanity, a sign to other believers that they should stand against the tyrant, even at the cost of death,and celebrate the ones who sacrifice their life in the fight of the oppressed against the oppressor. It is about celebrating, exalting, and glorifying the victim. That is why Shia Muslims (est. 200 million) in what is now Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bahrain, and Syria have mournfully commemorated Ashura for the last 1,300 years.

Human history is ripe with such rituals, but what is significant about Ashura and Iran is that it has managed to project itself so powerful that even Islamic Republic's international conduct is affected by this meta-narrative. For one thing, Ashura gatherings and processions were effectively used by the Clergy in Iran to overthrow Mohammad Reza Shah during the Islamic revolution In Iran.

Morteza Aviny, an Iranian journalist covering the Iran-Iraq war once wrote: "Whoever who wants to understand us should study the battle of Karbala." That is how the Iranian nation defined its relation to Saddam after he invaded Iran. They saw themselves as the victims and oppressed, and as followers of Hossein when they lined against Saddam's army (projected as the army of Yazid). War literature produced in Iran was drenched in the story of Ashura and its symbols could be found everywhere among the Iranian fighters. That's why army casualties were glorified as those who had proved to be true followers of Imam Hossein. And most interestingly, when Iran accepted UN Resolution 598 for the ceasefire with Iraq, its substantial demand was not war reparations, but to be recognized as the victim of invasion (which it achieved finally).

Ashura did not stop during the Iran-Iraq war. In fact, as Shias famously say among themselves, for them "all the days are Ashura and all the earth is Karbala." It is based on such a point of view that the Iranian leadership after the revolution defined its relations with western powers, particularly Britain and the United States. The contemporary Iran sees itself as the victim of years of British colonialism in the Middle East. It had a brief moment of hope for prosperity and freedom during Mossadegh, but it was dashed by the joint Anglo-American coup in 1953 which reinstalled the Shah. Iranians led by the Clergy came to interpret it along the lines of Ashura where they became the victims again, and the U.S. and UK became the Yazids of the time. That is how the Islamic Republic came to view itself as the one who should play its Ashura role not only in the Muslim world, but also elsewhere in the world, especially when they rise against the United States. Take, for example, the recent British embassy take over in Tehran. If one looks closely at the images of the event, she/he could see that the biggest flags and signs were those over which the name of Imam Hossein and symbols of Ashura were written.

If one deems the British embassy crisis to be a small event in today's virulent international politics, it could hardly be true about the nuclear standoff between Iran and the United States. One suspects that the same meta-narrative has projected itself upon the nuclear issue. Iranians not only see the issue as a matter of their national pride, but also see it as their right which if taken away, would have catastrophic consequences for both sides. But that is not a problem for Iranians who believe in Imam Hossein and his path. In fact, the Supreme Leader of Iran has clearly mentioned this connection when he said "if the adversary pushes too far, another Battle of Karbala will happen." A reference to a gloomy event like Ashura, when there are many other victorious battles throughout Islam's history, is indicative of the extent to which the current Iranian leadership and its followers could go in their standoff with the United States.

Ashura seems to be a simple religious ritual like many others, but it has turned out to have significant implications for the world. This meta-narrative has shaped the world view of a very important nation in the Middle East and whoever wants to comprehend Iran's conduct should certainly understand the story of Ashura first.


Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Very perceptive insights.

Very perceptive insights. What are your thoughts on the concept of the Iman Zaman/Mahdi, in terms of the IRI's meta-narrative? President Ahmadinejad and the IRGC seem to be deeply and personally invested in it, to the point of having elevated it as a major force behind foreign AND domestic policy (often to the dismay of Khamenei).

Although your view about the

Although your view about the influence of Ashura's culture on Shias Muslims is a part of the truth, but one can not interpret the whole Shias behaviors solely based on that especially when it comes to the foreign policy issue. For those Islamic clergies who want to draw the lines for foreign policy there are many other elements that Shia has used throughout his long history.

The war between Iran and Saddam was a good example. During the battle Iran used Ashura’s culture to get the support of his people, but for accepting the peace Iran used, Imam Hassan’s behavior. I believe this is why, in Ayatollah Khomeini’s view of Islamic government, a person who knows Islam as a whole (not only basec on Ashura) leads the country.

@Tabby and Mohsen, You are

@Tabby and Mohsen, You are both right about the other religious sources of Iran's foreign policy. I agree with this idea that other Imams are also important. However, I argue, if you like, for the most important Imam! And I believe the most important and the most resonant is the third Imam.

Point well said! To support

Point well said! To support your idea, watch the documentary BBC has produced about Iran. It is called "once upon a time in Iran".

During the past 32 years .

During the past 32 years . 1979-2011 , USA always acted sa an enemy with Iran an its people.USA imposed alot of Unilateral and UN Sanctions against Iran that all of them were against Human Right Law . During the war ( Iraq - Iran ) USA suported Saddam"s government in all the fields. Also USA army attacked Iran's ships and airplane and killed children and women in Persian Gulf .In summery USA govt had a very unfriendly behaiver with Iranian people and it is too late for USA to make a friendly relation with Iran.

It has had deep influence on

It has had deep influence on the Shias culture, but not on the Iran' foreign policy.

Reza jan, the extent of Iran

Reza jan, the extent of Iran-U.S. relations is very complicated, as I'm sure you know. And it's a two-way street. Perhaps Iran's creation and funding of terrorist organizations, human rights abuses committed against its own people, virulent anti-American rhetoric that could justify and promote more attacks against Americans, support of violent Shiite factions in Iraq that have attacked American forces, and of course, precarious pursuit of a nuclear weapons program...have also damaged its relationship with the U.S. I would urge for balance and accountability when discussing this deteriorating relationship. At the very least, the U.S. government is taking important steps at public diplomacy towards the Iranian people, repeatedly emphasizing that it supports THEM, while disagreeing with their government. I don't, however, see the regime in Iran displaying any friendly behavior towards the American people. Not now, and not when I was growing up in Iran. Mutuality is key!

TD jan , as you know USA only

TD jan , as you know USA only tries for its benefits all over the world. And in this way they had a lot of wars, that the latest example is the war in Iraq. As you know USA entred to Iraq to find and destroy dangerous weapons , like Nuclear - biologic and chemichal ( WDP ).but they didn't find any thing but by doing this their copanies came to Iraq an began to earn lots of money.During this so -called war aginst terrorism and ... about one milion of Iraq people ( children - women- old men and women ) died because of Antyhumanitarian sanctions and war.All of these things happened to improve USA benefits and its HEJMONY
to be a first power all over the world.
Finally , if you study about Dr. Mosaddeg and USA & Britain sanctions and activities Like 28 Mordad &....
you will know and understand alot about USA and its Foriegn Policy .

این جان گفتن رضا و تی دی اونم

این جان گفتن رضا و تی دی اونم به زبان اجنبی ایز بدجوری مارولس اونم توپول!

اوسگلین دست خوتونم نیست


Visit CPD's Online Library

Explore CPD's vast online database featuring the latest books, articles, speeches and information on international organizations dedicated to public diplomacy. 

Join the Conversation

Interested in contributing to the CPD Blog? We welcome your posts. Read our guidelines and find out how you can submit blogs and photo essays >