The CPD Blog is intended to stimulate dialog among scholars and practitioners from around the world in the public diplomacy sphere. The opinions represented here are the authors' own and do not necessarily reflect CPD's views. For blogger guidelines, click here.

Identity Crisis: Israel in the Middle East

Feb 10, 2011

by

Over the last century or so, Israelis have worked to make Israel a part of the Middle East. Israeli sabras (native born Israelis) with their argumentative attitudes; take no prisoners mentality; love for hummus, falafel and “Israeli” salad; tan skin; the yalla (let’s go) and no-translation needed ‘tseh (tongue hiss) live up to the Middle Eastern stereotypes and fit in with regional commonalities. If a tourist was dropped off in a nightclub or beach in Beirut or Tel Aviv, the only notable difference between the patrons would be the spoken language. Cultural similarities are not the only commonalities between Israel and her neighbors. Take Lebanon as another example--both in Israel and in Lebanon, the ultra-religious parties have a large say in the government. Even the root words, in both Arabic and Hebrew, for religious school are the same—madrasa and midrasha. Please do not think I am comparing Hezbollah to Shas—but that, simply, some parallels can be drawn. The democratic governments of Israel and Lebanon allow for religious parties to gain power and representation, Egypt’s autocracy has a long standing ban on the Muslim Brotherhood, so that the religious political group could not gain a foothold in the government.

While these parallels are not often addressed in the context of Israeli-Arab relations, because of obvious circumstances, they should be noted as important tools of public diplomacy to bring Israel and her Arab neighbors closer together. It is better that Israel and Lebanon fight battles with chickpeas and tehina (tahini) than with guns and bombs.

Similarities aside, there is one drastic difference that has stuck in my head since the surge of pro-democracy protests began on January 25th -- that while almost all the various publics in the Middle East are supporting the people of Egypt -- the people of Israel are quiet and scared, not sharing their support for their Egyptian neighbors, but focused on the fear that they might have to face if Hosni Mubarak can no longer maintain control over the cold peace between the countries. But, what if, for a moment, the Israeli public was just like any other Middle Eastern population? What if Israelis demonstrated en masse in Kikar Rabin (Rabin Square), Tel Aviv or on Ben Yehuda Street, Jerusalem in support of democracy throughout the Middle East? What message does that send to the people of Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan? What would that public diplomacy action represent? That all people of the Middle East deserve a representative democracy, freedom of speech, religion, gender equality, personal security. If Israelis could send that message and the 80% of the Israeli Jewish population in support of a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict could pressure the democratically elected government of Israel to create peace with her Palestinian partners—then, what would Israel have to worry about in the region? Where would be the fear and the threats? There would be the same amount as in every Middle Eastern country afraid of Al Qaeda (just as Israel is afraid of Hamas). Israel would be truly Middle Eastern.

Identity crisis solved.

COMMENTS

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 COMMENT(S)

A nice try, but throroughly

A nice try, but throroughly naive. It is outdated to think that Israeli-Palestinian peace would establish a lasting middle east peace... threats from Iran, Syria, and Lebanon quite honestly have nothing to do with Palestinians-- they have to do with hatred of true democracy and Western values.

Furthermore, it is outrageous that you think the Israeli public should force the Israeli government to make peace with the Palestinians-- I think it should be the other way around, Israel has been asking a real Palestinian partner to come to the table time and time again, only to be rebuffed because no truely peace seeking Palestinian has assumed the postition. Force the Palestinians, because overwhelmingly, the Israelis are ready.

And lastly, Naomi, remember one thing. Israelis are scared-- do they support democracy? I'm sure they do whole-heartedly. Have the "democracies" around them stayed friendly democracies... no. They would be naive to think that their protests would do anything to support secular democracy-- Hamas who was "democratically elected" is still trying to destroy them, and Iran's "democracy," well, you know the story. Can you blame Israelis for being apprehensive? For being truly worried about what the change might mean?
I understand your point in this blog, but for the sake of looking credible and rational, please put emotional politics aside and consider the facts when publishing a piece.

Really? Israel has been

Really? Israel has been waiting for a Palestinian partner? The recent Palestine Papers leaks sure indicated otherwise. Bibi and Lieberman have not shown Israel to be ready for peace by any stretch.

Your comments are a recycling of stale and specious talking points. Before dismissing something as "naive," try widening your perspective beyond your narrow lens.

Well said, Naomi.

Well said, Naomi.
Johan, I think these conversations might be more productive without sarcasm and name-calling. I could call your embrace of the status-quo outdated, or I could call naive, your belief that Arab resentment is all about hatred of democracy, but how open do you feel at this point to considering anything else I might have to say? If you don't speak respectfully you just get people's backs up. You get Paul responding in kind. I agree, let's put emotion aside. I agree there is plenty of reason to be skeptical about the change that is happening, but we can't continue to brag about being the only democracy in the region and not support democratic movement elsewhere, no matter how tenuous.

Johan, thanks for reading, to

Johan, thanks for reading, to build on what Daniel offered, I hope you can open your mind a little more in this context. Paul, thanks for the backup. Daniel, I agree wholeheartedly with you, Israel, just like the U.S., as a democracy should support democratic movements and while there is room for significant concern, there is even more room for hope and progress.

STAY IN THE KNOW

Visit CPD's Online Library

Explore CPD's vast online database featuring the latest books, articles, speeches and information on international organizations dedicated to public diplomacy. 

Join the Conversation

Interested in contributing to the CPD Blog? We welcome your posts. Read our guidelines and find out how you can submit blogs and photo essays >