The CPD Blog is intended to stimulate dialog among scholars and practitioners from around the world in the public diplomacy sphere. The opinions represented here are the authors' own and do not necessarily reflect CPD's views. For blogger guidelines, click here.

Planning Soft Power’s Future

Oct 18, 2011

by

LONDON --- For much of the past decade, “soft power” has been touted as a means for making foreign policy more effective by emphasizing enticement rather than coercion, conversation rather than conflict. The concept has won applause, but putting it into practice has often been half-hearted, especially by nations that possess significant military muscle. They prefer macho diplomacy and remain wary of the public diplomacy that puts soft power into practice.

The United Kingdom is a notable exception to this. Its policymakers in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) are sophisticated and articulate in their discussions of how to weave public diplomacy into the fabric of British foreign policy. They clearly see that Britain can make public diplomacy work for it, and this is reflected in their promotion of next year’s Olympic Games, Queen Elizabeth’s 60-year jubilee, and other events to which Britain can lay claim. They will use these events to enhance the notion that Britain is a country to be admired. We will still see the bagpipers, the red-coated guards, the crown jewels, and other reminders of past glories, but Britain has recognized that today it is a middle power and is searching for ways to take full advantage of that.

A meeting last week at FCO’s conference center, Wilton Park, underscored this commitment to modern foreign policy realities. About 50 policymakers, academics, and other public diplomacy aficionados from around the world gathered to discuss how public diplomacy – which involves reaching out to publics rather than governments – might make soft power a more dominant factor in international relations.

In addition to the UK, countries represented included Norway, China, Israel, The Netherlands, Jordan, France, Uruguay, and others. Other participants included spokespersons for NATO, OECD, and the virtual states Al Jazeera and Facebook. The breadth of this roster illustrates the wide interest in soft power. It should be noted, however, that while other nations are eager to participate in such conferences, the FCO and Wilton Park are probably the most pro-active governmental bodies in the world in terms of persistent efforts to refine the scholarly and practical consideration of public diplomacy.

That the UK should take the lead on this makes sense. During the past 60 years, Britain has shed, sometimes painfully, its imperial hubris while retaining its desire to play a significant role in world affairs. During my meetings in London with officials from FCO, the British Council (probably the world’s best cultural diplomacy agency), and others, I found a level of interest in and commitment to the wielding of soft power that other nations, including the United States, might study carefully and perhaps emulate.

A lesson emerging from this is that those at the summit of power ought to contemplate the value of public diplomacy before they feel forced to do so. The UK is a good example of a country that is supplanting muscle with wisdom. If its officials at the FCO, Wilton Park, the British Council, and elsewhere within its foreign policy community retain their commitment to soft power, British leadership might become even more important in global affairs.

Events in the Arab world earlier this year showed that fundamental change can take place without resort to old-style, bloody conflict. In an era in which revolutions rely more on social media than on machine guns, soft power will be ascendant. Governments throughout the world should take note.

COMMENTS

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 COMMENT(S)

Comments

Comments

Please discard the first version of this comment.
Mousa S. Burayzat on October 27, 2011 @ 1:21 am
As a participant in the said meeting at Wilton Park I must confess of two things. Firstly, admiration for the effort to establish `soft power` as a new paradigm in inter-state relations. Secondly, a long distance that has to be travelled before a sound intellectual and moral basis for this initiative can be convincingly reached .People who combine a decent background both in the theory and practical experience in the field of international relations - who, by the way, are not an insignificant flock, nowadays -will not find this exercise very attractive for more than one reason.
For these people, and I am sure others as well, power -soft or hard-is power. In any design or form it is intended to achieve a privileged position for one side at the expense of another, if not always at least some times. Otherwise, it would have been considered reciprocity, or, in a more mundane, manner, bargaining. Moreover, many who are not necessarily idealists still believe that for the future well-being of the human race on this planet, men and women of goodwill should strive for the upholding of principles, harmony, and co-operation among nations , peoples and groups alike. Power in whatever form or manner practiced should be either abandoned or relegated to a secondary place in nation`s and peoples` relations in this globalized world. The fact that a softer technique can be more palatable or even less painful in human dealings cannot hide the possibility that it can be also more harmful and injurious. During the meeting at Wilton Park , the group was exposed to one concrete example of how the notion of soft power can be employed for dubious, if not devious purposes.
________________________________________

STAY IN THE KNOW

Visit CPD's Online Library

Explore CPD's vast online database featuring the latest books, articles, speeches and information on international organizations dedicated to public diplomacy. 

Join the Conversation

Interested in contributing to the CPD Blog? We welcome your posts. Read our guidelines and find out how you can submit blogs and photo essays >