The CPD Blog is intended to stimulate dialog among scholars and practitioners from around the world in the public diplomacy sphere. The opinions represented here are the authors' own and do not necessarily reflect CPD's views. For blogger guidelines, click here.

Gulf Escalation Threatens Drinking Water

Jul 19, 2019

by

The Persian Gulf is one of the most populous and environmentally-sensitive regions in the world. Consequently, it is no surprise that Gulf states are increasingly dependent on desalination for their drinking water. But that dependence carries severe risks in a region as volatile as the Gulf has been, especially in light of recent tensions between the United States and Iran. Any accident or military conflict in the Gulf could cause massive spills of long-lasting contaminants such as crude oil or radioactive material into its waters, which could seriously threaten the lives and well-being of millions of people in the region.

Desalination in the Persian Gulf region has exploded in recent decades as governments have looked for ways to secure reliable water supplies. The Gulf is now home to the largest number of desalination plants in the world, with a total capacity of 11 million cubic meters per day—equivalent to nearly fifty percent of global daily desalinated water production.

Arab countries bordering the Persian Gulf heavily depend upon it for their drinking water needs. “Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Kuwait have the globe’s highest desalination capacities. According to the 2018 International Water Summit, the three Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries alone are responsible for more than one-third of the global desalination capacity.” It has been projected that their water demands will increase by 50 percent by 2050. Almost all of these countries will have no other options for water besides the Persian Gulf.

Based on reviewing recent published reports, including one by the Gulf Research Center (2012), the contribution of seawater desalination in producing potable water for the Arab countries of the Persian Gulf includes:

  • Saudi Arabia, with 30 major plants, gets more than 70 percent of its potable water from desalination
  • The United Arab Emirates (UAE), with 70 major desalination plants, gets more than 90 percent of its potable water from desalination
  • Kuwait, with 6 major desalination plants, gets more than 95 percent of its potable water from desalination
  • Qatar, with 3 major desalination plants, gets more than 90 percent of its potable water from desalination

 

This dependence takes on increased seriousness when we consider that these countries do not have beyond a few days’ consumption of drinking water safety stock storage capacity. Also, their desalination plants are highly vulnerable to military attacks, oil spills, and other seawater contamination, any of which could easily force their closure. For example, the Seki oil tanker incident in 1994 could have turned into a major disaster if the spilled oil had reached the intakes of the desalination plant in the emirate of Fujairah. Likewise, in July 1997, diesel fuel spilled from a grounded barge in the emirate of Sharjah, entered the intake of a desalination plant, and led to a major contamination of the water supply of an estimated half million people. This event left Sharjah without water for a day.

There are national security implications as well as humanitarian considerations surrounding the vulnerability of Gulf desalination plants. The potable water supply of the largest U.S. military base in the Middle East, Al Udeid air base in Qatar, home to some 11,000 U.S. military personnel, is also at risk.


Before the start of scorching summer months of July and August and for their own sake, these U.S. allies should immediately and urgently initiate and engage in vigorous diplomatic efforts to ease tensions with Iran.

If the current crisis in the Persian Gulf is not defused, then it could result in a runaway escalatory cycle of accidental or premeditated violence targeting military and civilian sites, and could cause an environmental catastrophe. Any shooting war in the Persian Gulf, even one that began as a so-called “low-intensity” conflict meant to punish Iran with a “bloody nose,” would risk escalation. As Winston Churchill said (in My Early Life, 1930):

Let us learn our lessons. Never, never, never believe any war will be smooth and easy, or that anyone who embarks on the strange voyage can measure the tides and hurricanes he will encounter… The Statesman who yields to war fever must realize that once the signal is given, he is no longer the master of policy but the slave of unforeseeable and uncontrollable events. Antiquated War Offices, weak, incompetent or arrogant Commanders, untrustworthy allies, hostile neutrals, malignant Fortune, ugly surprises, awful miscalculations – all take their seats at the Council Board on the morrow of a declaration of war… Always remember, however sure you are that you can easily win, that there would not be a war if the other man did not think that he also had a chance.

Donald Trump has threatened the “obliteration” of Iran in the event of a conflict, all but ensuring escalation. It is surely worth noting that, according to The New York Times, “senior officials” from both Saudi Arabia and the UAE have told U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo “that they do not want a war with Iran…[and] In such a shooting war, the senior administration official said, those two countries would most likely bear the brunt of the repercussions.” It would seem that they are aware of the risks that war would pose to their own interests.

The ability of the people who live around the Persian Gulf to subsist depends on the availability of potable water. The sources of that water and their safety and security are interdependent and intertwined with the state of relations between the Arab Gulf states and their northern neighbor Iran. Iran’s two most influential Gulf antagonists, Saudi Arabia and the UAE, live in desalination glass houses and should be careful about throwing stones at Iran lest they invite the conflict they seem keen to avoid. Before the start of scorching summer months of July and August and for their own sake, these U.S. allies should immediately and urgently initiate and engage in vigorous diplomatic efforts to ease tensions with Iran.

Note from the CPD Blog Manager: This article was previously published here by LobeLog.

Photo (CC BY-NC 2.0) | Stuart Rankin via Flickr

COMMENTS

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 COMMENT(S)

Why isn't this more widely known?

Thank you for this article. I have tried to keep up with Middle East events since I lived and worked there quite a few years ago, but I hadn't realized the extent of the progress in desalination. Is no one trying to tell our leaders how much an attack on Iran could backfire? Iran itself is not so dependent on desalination, it wouldn't hurt them as much as all their Gulf neighbors. Furthermore, they have a fair number of oil installations in the Gulf, and tankers to spare. They could contaminate the entire Gulf by themselves, and not even have to sink anybody else's tankers.

Persian Gulf safety, sustainability and security issues

Thanks dear Ms. Lester for your kind and thoughtful feedback, which I appreciate.

My colleagues, students and I have written and published a few scholarly articles on this topic and interdependencies of safety, sustainability and security issues in the Persian Gulf, which include many facts and figures. I would be happy to send you their copies, if you are interested.

I strongly believe that countries on the southern coast of the Persian Gulf should try to talk to (and somehow learn to live with) their neighbor, Iran on its northern coast, no matter of their ideological or political differences and regardless of whom or what regime is in power in Tehran, Riyadh or Abu Dhabi or their (in Thomas Jefferson's words) "entangling alliances" with outside powers; as this is not a choice, it is a just a brute necessity....I think i have called it somewhere possibly in one my talks or articles that it is the inconvenient truth of the Persian Gulf or what I call: the "Tyranny of the Persian Gulf Geography"!

Please feel free to send me an email to: meshkati [@] usc [dot] edu.

Best Regards
Najm Meshkati
Professor, USC

Join the Conversation

Interested in contributing to the CPD Blog? We welcome your posts. Read our guidelines and find out how you can submit blogs and photo essays >